https://american-girls.linkupdate.nl/ https://american-girls.time2surf.nl/ https://american-girls.cloudtools.nl/ https://american-girls.officetime.nl/ https://american-girls.psas.nl/ https://american-girls.linksnaar.nl/ https://american-girls.lcvm.nl/ https://american-girls.mellaah.nl/ People at the top of the SMV market, though, the ones who had lots of relationships, sexual experiences, and choice are less likely to be happy in the long-term, though they likely will be more satisfied (experiential happiness) in the short-term. Their abundance of choice is likely to lead to choice addiction, and ultimate dis-satisfaction with the choices they DO ultimately make.
The manosphere often discusses the “carousel” that young women in hook-up culture pursue before settling down. I personally don’t think such women are immoral, any more than I would think a man is necessarily immoral for pursuing sexual experience. Sexual morality is relative, and my code may differ from yours. But I DO think that such pursuits ultimately affect happiness and future satisfaction negatively, though the may well improve present satisfaction.
So if you accept this argument, the Beta (Fe-dominant, somewhat attractive family man) should experience the most happiness, though not necessarily the most satisfaction. Which, I believe, is what you said. Sorry for the repetition :)
Dr. Jeremy
October 31, 2014 at 1:36 am
@ Jeremy
Yes. I see your final point now of “too many options”. There is an optimal “medium” amount of options for happiness. Too few and there is no choice. Too many and it overly complicates or waters down the value of whatever is chosen. Thus, the guy who can have “any girl” may be less happy with any one of them. Then again, I don’t know whether that is a result of him having too many choices, or not enough challenge to enjoy the journey of obtaining that woman, or both.
